Impact on BOM for Various Use Cases

A SAW-less architecture significantly reduces the cost of an LTE Cat M1/NB1 modem.

See Figure 5. The electronic BOM of a legacy implementation (5-b) can be up to 30 percent more expensive than a SAW-less architecture (5-c).

Let’s look at three configurations to quantify this cost gap. One is a simple dual band SKU, another a US SKU and the last a dual mode M1/NB1 North America plus Europe SKU.

As can be seen from this comparison, A SAW-less design architecture allows the device cost to remain consistent regardless of the number of bands used, while traditional design architecture is already more expensive in a 2-band configuration with cost increasing for each band added.

Figure 5: SAW-less Design BOM Comparison

Test Your Knowledge

Participate in the quiz to test your knowledge throughout the white paper experience. Upon completing the quiz you will have a chance to provide your email address in order to receive an email summarizing your responses.

Thank you for participating. Enjoy!

Enter your name and email to get result.

Send me Results

Download White Paper

If you’ve found value in this white paper, you can easily share it via the social share buttons. But if there is someone you’d like to share this with who prefers a printed document, we’ve included a nicely formatted and printable PDF for you.